[A. CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:12] >> I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. SO LET'S, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL ROLE? >> BRIAN OLGUIN. MONICA RODRIGUEZ. >> WE HAVE A QUORUM. [B. Communication] >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I WANT TO REMIND EVERYONE, TONIGHT'S MEETING IS BEING SIMULCAST VIA TV 15. GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT UP TO CITIZENS COMMUNICATION. DO WE HAVE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ITEMS NOT WISH LISTED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME AND I BELIEVE I GOT MR. MICHAEL ? THANK YOU, SIR. AGAIN, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR TIME FOR THREE MINUTES. >> BE UNDER THREE MINUTES. I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT AN AUDIBLE HOUSING. YOU KNOW, THE MARKET HAS GOT A WHOLE BUNCH HOTTER AND VICTOR, A GOOD EXAMPLE WHERE I LIVE, I BOUGHT A TRAILER HOUSE IN VICTORIA AND IT WAS 225 LOT FEE AND THAT WAS IN 1994. IN 2024, IT IS $410. THE LOT FEE WOULD COVER YOUR WATER AND SEWER AND IN THIS SCENARIO, IT DOESN'T COVER NOTHING. YOU PAY YOUR OWN WATER AND SEWER AND IN RETURN, IF YOU NEED SERVICE, YOU DON'T GET NO SERVICE OR IT IS VERY DELAYED. AND WHAT LITTLE SERVICE YOU GET IS BECAUSE OF ATTORNEY ADAM WEST. HE IS OVERSEEING EVERYTHING TO MAKE SURE WE GET TREATED FAIRLY AND I APPRECIATE WHAT HE DOES. YOU KNOW, WE HAD SEWER LEAKS AND WATER LEAKS AND THEY ARE FIXING IT AND FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS, WE HAVE NEEDED HELP POTHOLES AND IT IS HARD TO GET THEM FIXED AND THINGS LIKE MANAGEMENT HAS BEEN STONEWALLING AND ALL OF THAT KIND OF STUFF. I DO APPRECIATE STEVE FROM CODE ENFORCEMENT. HE IS NO LONGER WITH THEM. HE DID A LOT OF WORK IN THE TRAILER PARK OVERSEEING EVERYTHING AND I APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THE CITY OF VICTORIA HAS DONE HELPING GET IT IN ORDER BECAUSE SOMETIMES, MANAGEMENT DUST JUST DON'T WANT TO HELP YOU THANKS. HAVE A GOOD EVENING. APPRECIATE IT. >> THANK YOU, SIR. ALL RIGHT. LOOKS LIKE WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE ELSE SO I WILL GO AHEAD [1. Variance Request for Minimum Lot with for Vitex Subdivision - 105 N Jo...] AND CLOSE THE CITIZENS COMMUNICATION PUBLIC HEARING AND NEXT, OUR DEVELOPMENT AND ITEMS THAT NEEDED PUBLIC HEARING. OUR FIRST ITEM IS A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR VITEX SUBDIVISION. STAFF, MAY I PLEASE HAVE YOUR REPORT, SIR. >> YES, SIR. GOOD AFTERNOON. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 103, 105, AND 107 NORTH JOHN STOCKBAUER DRIVE. THE SUBJECT DOHERTY CURRENTLY EXIST AS A SINGLE-FAMILY LOT WITH THREE SEPARATE COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES ON THE LOT. THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD LIKE TO SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY INTO THREE SEPARATE COMMERCIAL LOTS FOR EXISTING COMMERCIAL TENANTS. THE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE WOULD ALLOW FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY INTO TWO COMMERCIAL LOTS AND ONE INDUSTRIAL LOT. THE VARIANCE WOULD ALLOW FOR LOT TO BE APPLIED WITH THE LOT FRONTAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 39 FEET WHILE MEETING ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS HELD BY THE CITY CODE FOR INDUSTRIAL LOTS. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE ORDER -- ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOTS, IT IS ORDERED THAT CROSS ACCESSIBILITY BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY'S OFFICE. NO BUSINESS OR STRUCTURED WILL BE ALLOWED TO BE IN THE SHARED CROSS ACCESS COMMON DRIVEWAY. FURTHERMORE, STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT A ALIGNING WITH THE PROPOSED VARIANCE SHOULD NOT BE REGIMENTED TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, OR WELFARE OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT VITEX SUBDIVISION. >> ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE IS ANYBODY WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME. >> GOOD EVENING. I AM MONICA WITH URBAN ENGINEERING. I AM THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE OWNER. WE ARE REPLANTING THIS PROPERTY FOR THEM . HOWARD MARK IS THE ATTORNEY THAT IS WORKING ON THE SHARED ACCESS AND [00:05:03] UTILITY EASEMENT. WE HAVE A DRAFT OF THAT HUMMING TO US. I DO NOT HAVE IT YET. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THAT, PLEASE ASK ASK AND I WILL BE AVAILABLE. >> WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT GETS -- WHAT I THINK AMOUNT BEFORE IT GETS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. I DON'T KNOW FROM A RULES'S PERSPECTIVE. >> WHAT WE TYPICALLY DO IS RECONDITION IT WHENEVER WE DO TO CITY COUNCIL WHEN WE DO OUR AIM THAT THE PLAT WILL NOT BE FILED UNTIL WE RECEIVE THE SHARED ACCESS AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT. >> AND DO WE HAVE TO SAY THE SAME WORDING IN OUR MOTION? I AM JUST ASKING. >> NO. IF YOU LIKE YOU CAN, BUT WE WILL WRITE IT IN OUR AIM. >> ALL RIGHT. DOES ANYBODY -- DO Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >> THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTION THAT WE HAVE BUT I WOULD LIKE THAT STIPULATED IN OUR MOTION . >> >> JUST TO MAKE EVERYONE AWARE, STAFF DOES DO A GOOD JOB WHENEVER WE DO THIS. THEY DO REQUIRE THAT ON THE PLAT, WE INDICATED THAT IT IS THE SUBJECT TO A SHARED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT. WE LEAVE A BLANK FOR THE INSTRUMENT NUMBER. THEY HAVE TO REVIEW IT AND WE GIVE IT TO THEM PRIOR TO IT BEING RECORDED BECAUSE IF IT IS UNACCEPTABLE IN ANY MANNER OR, IF THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH IT, THEY WILL LET US KNOW AND THEY WILL NOT ACCEPT. >> AND THAT INSURANCE NUMBER HAS TO BE ON THE PLAT BEFORE WE EVEN BRING IT TO PLANNING COMMISSION TO SIGN IT. >> ALL RIGHT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS -- >> PHYSICALLY, YOU ARE SAYING THAT IT IS GOING TO COME BEFORE US AGAIN? >> BASICALLY, THEY HAVE TO GIVE IT BEFORE. SO, Y'ALL CAN APPROVE THE VARIANCE ON THE CONDITION THAT THEY PROVIDE US THE SHARED ACCESS AGREEMENT. ON THE PLAT THAT HE PROVIDED TO STAFF, THEY ALREADY HAVE THAT ON THE PLAT WHERE IT SAYS THE INSTRUMENT NUMBER. IT IS JUST CURRENTLY BLANK. SO, UNTIL WE GET THAT, WE CAN'T ACTUALLY HAVE IT SIGNED, BUT THE ACCESS AGREEMENT DOESN'T HAVE TO HOLD UP YOU ARE GRIEVING APPROVING THE VARIANT AND PLAN. YOU WOULD WANT TO HOLD IT UP IN IF THEY DO NOT HAVE THAT NOTE THEY WERE GOING TO PROVIDE IT BUT SINCE WE REQUIRE THEM TO PUT IT ON THERE, THAT IS THE REQUIREMENT FOR IT TO BE ON THERE. IT WON'T ACTUALLY GET SIGNED UNLESS IT IS ACCEPTED BY US. SO, THERE IS A CHANCE THAT IT BECOMES UNACCEPTABLE AND WE STILL KEEP GOING BACK AND FORTH THERE MAYBE A CHANCE WE HAVE TO COME BACK, BUT IF WE FOLLOW OUR TEMPLATE, WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH IT. >> I MOVED TO APPROVAL. >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE BY DAVID BROWN TO APPROVE THE -- >> YOU WILL HAVE TO CLOSE YOUR PUBLIC HEARING FIRST. >> OH, YEAH. I DO. GOOD POINT. THANK YOU, MA'AM. ANYBODY ELSE? IF NOT, I AM GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS PARTICULAR VARIANCE REQUEST. I WILL OPEN IT UP TO THE COMMISSIONERS. DO I HAVE ANY MOTIONS? I HAVE A MOTION NOW FROM MR. BROWN TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST AND A SECOND BY MR. MENDOZA. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAI. >> AYE. >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, -- I WANT TO MAKE THAT COMMENT. ON THE CONDITION OF THE SHARED ACCESS EACH ELEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED ON THE FINAL PLAT. THAT THE CITY OF VICTORIA 'S PLANNING TEAM APPROVAL WHAT THE ARRANGEMENTS IS. I THINK THAT IS IMPORTANT. [D. Consent Agenda:] >> YES. >> IS. >> OKAY. SO, WE HAVE GOT THAT DONE. NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. THERE IS ONLY ONE ITEM ON THE CONSENT AGENDA IS OUR MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE THE 20TH 2024 MEETING. ANY MOTIONS OR ACTIONS? >> I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT IT. >> DR. HUNT MAKES A MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT. >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. [E. Other Business:] >> AYE. >> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SEEM SIGN. NOW, ALL OF THE BUSINESS. OR MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT REPORT. [00:10:02] >> FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE AND 2024, THE CITY OF VICTORIA HAS PROCESSED 166 PERMITS AND AS OF 2023 FOR THE SAME MONTH, WE ONLY PROCESSED 157 PERMITS. FOR MEP PERMITS IN THE PREVIOUS FUNDS, WE PROCESSED 136 PERMITS AND PERMITS FEES COLLECTED AS OF JUNE 2024 WERE $46,491 . FOR MASTER OF THE SAME MONTH, WE HAD 177 PERMITS AND COLLECTED $72,240 IN PERMITS. FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2024, THE CITY OF VICTORIA PROCESSED ONE MAJOR PLAT, THREE SITE PLANS, ZERO MINOR PLANTS , A NOTE MODIFICATIONS. THANK YOU. LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION, SIR? >> -- >> FOR THE MOST PART, YEAH. A COUPLE THINGS ARE STILL WORKING THROUGH. I THINK THE BIGGEST PROBLEM WE ARE RUNNING THROUGH IS GETTING EVERYONE ON BOARD WITH THE NEW CHANGES BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE USING THE OLD FORMAT LIKE THIS IS JUST COMMERCIAL RATHER THAN LISTING [F. Items from Planning Commissioners:] OUT THE SPECIFIC USES WE SEE ON THE TABLE. >> GOOD DEAL. >> ALL RIGHT. NOW, THE NEXT THING ON THE AGENDA IS ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION. DO WE HAVE ANY THOUGHTS? ANYBODY? >> I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THE COMMISSIONERS ARE GOING TO BE PROVIDED WITH A HARD COPY OF THE ONES APPROVED. >> YES, WE ARE GOING TO WORK ON IT. THE REASON WE HAVEN'T PROVIDED IT SOONER IS WE HAVE BEEN GOING THROUGH THOSE AMENDMENTS AND WE PLAN TO GET THAT FLEET TO GO STUDENT WITH THAT ONE. WITH THIS LAST ROUND OF AMENDMENT, I THINK WE ARE GOING TO BE SET UNTIL WE DECIDE TO DO ANYMORE. >> WONDERFUL. >> WELL, IF NO OTHER ITEMS, IF THERE IS NO OTHER BUSINESS, I WILL GO AHEAD AND ADJOURN THE MEETING AT * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.