[A. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:10]
GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. WELCOME TO THE COMMISSION MEETING ON APRIL 18, 2024. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER.
TYLER, COULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL FOR US?
>> DAVID . PRESENT. DR. -- PRESENT.
PRESENT. COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ. PRESENT. -- .
COMMISSIONER SPEARS. PRESENT. >> WE QUORUM.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH BUT I WANT TO REMIND EVERYONE, THE MEETING TONIGHT IS -- CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS. ANY
[B. Communication]
CITIZEN WISHING TO ADDRESS THE VICTORIA PLANNING COMMISSION TONIGHT, PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME BUT IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK[1. Amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO.)]
TO AN ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE COME FORWARD. ALL RIGHT . I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS AN AMENDMENT TO UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE . JULIE, COULD YOU PLEASE -- TO MAKE GOOD EVENING.IT'S BEEN A REALLY GOOD COUPLE OF MONTHS. WE HAVE BEEN ADMINISTERING THE ORDINANCE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. AND THE PLAT ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THING UP TILL NOW. EVERYBODY IS UTILIZING THE NEW ORDINANCE.
AS WE HAVE BEEN ADMINISTERING IT, WE FOUND SOME ERRORS AND TYPOS AND THINGS. UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. IT THINGS I TOLD YOU THIS ORDINANCE WOULD NOT BE PERFECT AND WOULD BE COMING BACK WITH SOME THINGS THAT NEED TO BE CHANGED. CHANGE BEFORE THE JUNE 1ST OPT OUT DEADLINE EXPIRES AND EVERYONE HAS TO FOLLOW THE NEW D AND THE EXTRA PERIODS BUT I DID NOT ADD THOSE ON THE PRESENTATION. THESE ARE THE ONES THAT PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
THAT WAS GETS WITH ALL OF THE TRACK CHANGES. I THINK IT INADVERTENTLY GOT DELETED. WE DID NOT MEAN TO DELETE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FROM MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS. THAT IS BEEN ADDED BACK IN AS WHAT IT'S IS REQUIRED FOR THAT IS TWO PARKING SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT. WE ALSO ADDED A REFERENCE TO THE BAR SECTION. THAT MAKES MORE SENSE ON THE NEXT SLIDE.
NIGHTCLUB LOUNGES, WE ADDED A REFERENCE TO OUR REGULATIONS THAT ARE IN CHAPTER 14. WE ADDED CHAPTER 14 REFERENCE ON THE ACTUAL TABLE. IN SEVERAL MENTAL STANDARDS, WE ADDED THAT DOES NOT AUDIO] NIGHTCLUB AND LOUNGES . WHAT ABOUT BARS? OBVIOUSLY THEY ALSO HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES SO WE ADDED THAT THAT THE FIRST SECTION, A IS A NEW TO THE NEW DEAL BUT NOT TO THE OLDER ORDINANCES WOULD THE OLD ORDINANCE HAD A PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER CAVEAT. THIS IS FOR SHOPPING CENTERS LIKE THE COLTS SHOPPING CENTER. THEY REALLY FUNCTION AS ONE LOT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE OWNERSHIP, IT IS MULTIPLE OWNERS. THE PARKING LOT AS ONE LARGE PARKING LOT. SO THE PUBLIC IS NOT REALLY REALIZE THERE WERE LOTS. IN THOSE CASES, WHEN IT IS ALL MASTER PLAN AND WE NEED A DEVIATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL LOT SIZE , DEPTH, SETBACK HER, ANY KIND OF THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS . IT IS NOT A VARIANCE WHEN IT IS A PLAN SHOPPING CENTER BUT WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PLAT AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION CAN APPROVE IT. IT DOES NOT HAVE TO
[00:05:01]
GO ON COUNCIL VARIANCE . REALIZE THAT FLEXIBILITY WAS LEFT OUT BECAUSE EVERYTHING HAD MOVED TO THE ACTUAL LAND USE CHART. I DO NOT GET PUT INTO THE SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS TO HAVE FLEXIBILITY SO WE EDIT THAT BACK IN THAT IS A COPY AND PASTE FROM OUR OLD ORDINANCE TO THE UDO.THE NAMES OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS. I THINK WE GOT ON THE DISCUSSION WITH COUNCIL ABOUT THE WEIGHT WANT HISTORIC DISTRICTS TO REGULATE WHAT YOU CAN AND CANNOT DO WITH YOUR HISTORIC PROPERTY. THE BASICS GOT JUST IN OFFICE, BUT THERE IS ACTUALLY TWO KIND OF DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICTS. THE PURPLE IS THE ORIGINAL TOWN SITE HISTORIC DISTRICT. OF COURSE, THAT IS AN AREA WE ALL CALL DOWNTOWN. IT IS NORTH STREET, EAST, AND WATER IS TO THE SOUTH.
THAT IS IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. THAT THE ORIGINAL TOWN SITE HISTORIC DISTRICT. DOWNTOWN BUSINESS HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
HEIGHT LIMIT. THERE IS A MINIMUM -- MINIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT WITH CODE. THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT, NOT MINIMUM. JUST SAY THERE IS NO HEIGHT LIMIT. YOU WILL SEE THAT CHANGE ON E.
IS ALSO KIND OF CONFUSING. IT WAS READING IT. BUT ANY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS DO NOT WANT DUPLEXES OR TRIPLEX IS BEING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS. WE JUST WANT ONE. THE MAXIMUM OF ONE BUILDING UNIT. SHOULD I HAVE JUST ONE DWELLING UNIT? IT IS KIND OF SELF-EXPLANATORY BUT IT LED TO CONFUSION.
AGAIN, I AM NOT SURE HOW THEY GOT DELETED. BUT WE MANAGED TO DELETE THREE OF OUR HISTORIC DISTRICTS AND THAT WAS NOT THE INTENT. AGAIN, I THINK SO MUCH DISCUSSION ABOUT HISTORY STANDARDS AND SHOULD WE GET APPROPRIATE AND HOW MUCH SHOULD BE REGULATED OR NOT. THAT LED US TO OVERLOOK THE BASICS HAD SO THIS SECTION JUST RE-CREATES EXACTLY WHAT WE HAD.
>> CAN I ASK A QUESTION AT THIS POINT? ON THE COLLEGE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT, YOU HAVE GOT THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY AS AIRLINE. YOU MAY NOT TO BE HILLIARD?
>> NO. I WENT BACK AND LOOKED AT THE OLD ORDINANCE AND IT IS
HERE. >> SO WE HAVE PUT A 95 UNIT APARTMENT IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT?
>> AGAIN, THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS ONLY HAVE THE REGULATION OF NO MANUFACTURED HOMES AND NO BILLBOARDS. SO THAT WAS A BIG DISCUSSION WITH COUNCIL. WE WANTED TO BE MORE? THE ANSWER ENDED UP BEING NO PIT WANT TO MOVE IT TO NO TEXTURED HOMES AND NO BILLBOARDS
>> THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.
AND PASTE FOR OUR OLD ORDINANCE TO OUR NEW ORDINANCE.
WE WANTED TO KEEP THE FLEXIBILITY. IT DID NOT REALLY FIT IN THE TABLE. SO WE PUT IT IN A SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS ON SETBACKS FOR THAT IS FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES BUT IT IS AN EXISTING PARCEL THAT IS BEEN PLATTED AND NEED TO BE PLATTED OR REPLANTED. THAT EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PROVIDES SOME CONSTRAINTS ON MEETING THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
THIS ALLOWS THE SAME FLEXIBILITY. THAT IS A RECOMMENDATION BY STAFF TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. IT STILL REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL. IT WOULD BE KICKED OUT FOR A MINOR PLAT AND STREAMLINING THAT PROCESS SO THEY DO NOT HAVE TO GO TO COUNCIL.
THE NEXT IS PARKING. WE ELIMINATED PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL AND DOWNTOWN AND THE ORIGINAL TOWN SITE DISTRICTS. THE DOWNTOWN AREA. WE HAVE COME ACROSS SOME FOLKS WANTING TO PROVIDE THE PARKING. IF YOU READ THE OTHER PARKING SECTIONS, IT IS VERY CLEAR, I THINK, PROVIDING PARKING, YOU HAVE TO MEET THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS . TO CONTINUE TO LOOK ON. WHEN YOU READ THE SECTION WHICH IS THE FIRST SECTION AND YOU READ IT, OH, I DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT PARKING. THERE'S NO REASON TO KEEP MOVING ON AND REALIZE IF YOU DO PROVIDE PARKING, IT STILL HAS TO MEET THE SPECIFICATIONS WITH DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. SO WE ADDED THIS IN SO PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO KEEP READING ON ONCE THEY GET THAT.
A LOT OF THESE THINGS ARE CLARIFICATION. IT IS IN THERE AND WHAT WE NEED, BUT WE WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR.
[00:10:05]
SITUATION HERE. SO OF COURSE YOU HAVE TO PUT A DUMPSTER IN AN ENCLOSURE. IF YOU READ THE DUMPSTER IN CLOSER SECTION, IT REQUIRES THOSE DUMPSTER AREAS BE PAVED. WE HAD SOMEONE QUESTION SO WE MADE IT REAL CLEAR. AND NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD CONTAINERS BE PLACED ON UNPAID SERVICES FOR THAT IS AND OUR ORDINANCE SO WE ARE JUST TRYING TO MAKE IT VERY CLEAR FOR EVERYBODY. THERE A LOT OF QUESTIONS BECAUSE IT IS NEW. THEY ARE READING IT AND IT IS, LIKE, WHAT DID YOU MEAN? AFTER GETS ADMINISTERED MANY TIMES, THERE MAY BE WILL NOT BESO MUCH SECOND-GUESSING. >> COULD ASK ANOTHER QUESTION,
>> USE IT HAS TO BE A PAVED SURFACE. SO ASPHALT IS
ACCEPTABLE IN THIS CASE? >> YES.
>> WOULD IT BE MORE TERRIFYING IF YOU MADE IT ALL CONCRETE?
>> WELL, SO NOT ALL ASPHALT PARKING LOTS ARE MADE THE SAME.
THERE ARE SOME THAT HAVE STRONG BASIS .
WHEN YOU READ THE REST OF THIS SECTION, IT SAYS THAT THE APPROACHES SHALL BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES. TO WITHSTAND THE WEIGHT OF THE TRUCK AND ALL OF THAT. AT THE SAME TIME, IT IS SORT OF MAINTENANCE ISSUE. IF AN APPLICANT CHOOSES TO NOT COMPLETELY, YOU KNOW, IF THEY ARE REDEVELOPING AND THEY ADD THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, YOU KNOW, THEY DO NOT BUILD IT AS , TO THE HIGH SPECIFICATIONS THEY NEED AND THEY ARE CHOOSING TO TAKE ON THAT MAINTENANCE TOO.
IT IS IN THEIR BUT IT IS NOT JUST UNDER APPLICABLE AT THE.
THIS IS ONE OF THOSE ITEMS THAT RICK HAD ON HIS WISH LIST.
WE JUST , IT DID NOT MAKE IT IN. THIS IS ACTUALLY SOMETHING THAT HAS KIND OF BEEN BURIED IN BUILDING CODES BECAUSE WE ARE IN A WIND ZONE. HURRICANES. SIGNS OF HER 24 FEET FOR THE LAST DECADE OR MORE, WE HAVE BEEN REQUIRING THEM TO SUBMIT SEALED DRAWINGS TO MAKE SURE THEY CAN WITHSTAND WIND LOADS.
BUT IT WAS A LITTLE HARD IF WE EVER GOT QUESTION BECAUSE IT WAS TAKING OUT THE TABLES FROM THE BUILDING CODE AND THINK, OKAY, THIS IS A STRUCTURE. IT REALLY MAKES IT CLEAR. SIGNS OVER 25 FEET NEED TO BE ENGINEERED.
THE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED SECTION. THIS IS THE TWO WENT THROUGH. THE ORDINANCE HAD THIS PROVISION WHICH IS NOT REALLY FOLLOWED VERY WELL AT SO WE RESET AND SAID YES, WE WANT TO INCLUDE A BIT WE RAN INTO AN ISSUE WITH A CORNER LOT. NOT ONLY WAS IT A CORNER LOT, THE SEWER LINE TO EXTEND , IT WAS NOT FEASIBLE TO EXTEND IT BECAUSE OF THE DEPTH OF THIS WORLD LINE. ENGINEERING COMPONENTS BEING NICE UTILITIES. THE CITY ENGINEER WAS VERY MUCH, LIKE, THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. IS IT A VARIANCE? SO WE ADDED FLEXIBILITY SO THE CITY ENGINEER CAN MAKE THE CALL.
NO, WE'RE NOT GOING TO EXTEND THAT THROUGH BECAUSE IT LITERALLY WOULD NOT SERVE ANYBODY BECAUSE OF THE DEPTH OF THE SEWER LINE. FOR SITUATIONS LIKE THAT , WE ADDED THIS TO BASICALLY ALLOW THE CITY ENGINEER TO DETERMINE THE TWO WENT THROUGH AND HOW FAR . IF SO, IT COULD BE LESS, ESSENTIALLY.
THIS IS THE SECTION , THE FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE WE KNOW WE ARE GOING TO BE UPDATING. THIS IS KIND OF WHAT PROMPTED US TO BE SO DILIGENT ABOUT MAKING ALL THESE NOTES AND CHANGES AS WE WERE GOING THROUGH. WE KNEW WE WERE GOING TO HAVE TO DO THIS. WITH THE NOTICE THAT THEY WERE CHANGING THE MAPS, WE DID NOT HAVE ALL THE DETAILS. OF COURSE, THEY HAVE SINCE GIVEN US AND DELIVERED THE MOST RECENT FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY AND THE NEW MAPS. THEY HAVE A JULY 17TH DATE IN 2024. WE ALSO ARE AMENDING THE PERMIT PROCEDURES. THIS IS ONLY FOR THE FLOODPLAIN. BUT ALL FORMAL SURVEY FOR ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. CURRENTLY NOW, WHEN YOU GET -- HAVE TO SHOW THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THAT THEY ARE ABOVE THE BED -- BASELINE ELEVATION. ONLY HAVE THIS HAPPEN ONCE. OF COURSE, THE STATE HAS EIGHT POCKETS TO REMEDY ISSUES. NOT EVERYBODY ELSE DOES. WE WANT TO CATCH AND MAKE SURE THAT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN. A FORMAL SURVEY IS BASICALLY, THEY FORM UP THE FOUNDATION AND THEN THEY GO TO A SURVEY AND MAKE SURE THAT FOUNDATION IS GOING TO BE POURED AT THE APPROPRIATE BFP LEVEL. IT IS BASICALLY MAKING , THAT SURVEY IS REQUIRED AT THE END. THE SURVEYOR GOES TO DO THE FORM BOARD SURVEY AND IT GIVES THEM A JUMPSTART IT IS A LITTLE ADDED COST, BUT IT WOULD THEN PREVENT SOMEONE FROM BUILDING AN ENTIRE HOUSE, THE
[00:15:03]
BFU NOT BEING AT THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL, AND AFTER RAISE THE HORSE WHICH IS MUCH MORE COSTLY THAN IF THEY JUST REALIZED THEY FORMED THE FOUNDATION INCORRECTLY. SO THIS IS VERY, A VERY SMALL AMOUNT OF PERMITS AFFECTED BY THIS . IT IS ONLY IN THE FLOODPLAIN. SUBSIDIES ACTUALLY REQUIRE THESE SURVEYS FOR SETBACKS.THAT IS KIND OF STANDARD PRACTICE WELL CONSTRUCTION BUT WE DO NOT REALLY HAVE THE ISSUES WITH SETBACKS THIS IS A VERY FAST-GROWING DIVINITY SO IT WILL BE ONE HOUSE AFTER ANOTHER BEING PUT UP AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. THERE IS NOT AS MANY THINGS, I GUESS, FOR THE SURVEYORS, THE BUILDERS TO GO OFF OF SO THEY HAVE TO GET SURVEYS BEFORE THEY START FRAMING. WE'RE JUST LIVING IN IT TO THE PLUG -- THE PLUG SAME FOR THE RATE FIVE ESTABLISHMENT BUT IT IS NOT JUST THE FLOODPLAIN BUT FEMA ALSO REGULATES THE FLOODPLAIN AND THERE'S ALSO THE FLOODWAY. THE REGULATION OF THE FLOODWAY ARE VERY STRICT. THIS IS AN EXPLANATION OF WHAT THAT REGULATION IS. SO ENCROACHMENTS ARE PROHIBITED.
WITHIN THE ADOPTED REGULATORY FLOODPLAIN. ELEPHANT HAS BEEN DEVASTATED THROUGH THE HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ENGINEERING PRACTICES. HAVE A LOT OF ENGINEERS THAT ASK WHAT IS THAT? SO WE ADDED THIS SECOND PART TO BE VERY CLEAR WHAT THAT IS BUT THAT IS AN ENGINEERING NO RISER NO IMPACT CERTIFICATION. SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DATA THAT MUST STIPULATE NO IMPACT OR CHANGES TO THE 2500 -- THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FLOODWAY WITH THE NEW CROSS-SECTIONS. ALLOWING EXISTING CROSS-SECTION ANYWHERE IN THE MODEL. SO THE MODEL SHOULD BE RUN FOR A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE BOTH UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. SO THE NO RISE NO IMPACT CERTIFICATION BACKS UP THAT DATA AND THEY WANT TO SEE IT IT IT REALLY EXPLAINS THE RULE THAT WE ALREADY HAVE IN PLACE WAS. THE NEXT IS REALLY SIMPLE CHANGES IN OUR PROCEDURES. WE ACTUALLY ARE FLIPPING ITEM THREE AND FOUR. SO HOW THE SITE PLAN REVIEW IS IS THAT FOLKS SUBMIT TWO SETS OF SITE PLANS. WE WOULD LIKE THEM AND RETURN THEM AND THEY FIX THOSE REDLINES AND RETURNED BACK TO US. BECAUSE THESE WERE FLIPPED, ON THE FIRST SET OF REDLINES, THEY WOULD SUBMIT SIX COPIES SOMETIMES BACK TO US. THEY MAYBE DID NOT ADDRESS ALL THE REDLINES. THEY WERE SEMITIC SIX COPIES OF SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT APPROVED. QUEBEC WILLIE SIX COPIES OF THE FINAL APPROVED SITE PLAN OTHERWISE THAT IS A LOT OF EXTRA COPIES. BUT THEY USE THE SECTION AS A CHECKLIST. BY FLIPPING THEM AND CHANGING THEM ONCE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, THEN THEY SUBMIT THE SIX SETS. HOPEFULLY HE WILL NOT GET EXTRA UNNECESSARY SETS. SOME OF THESE ARE REALLY SIMPLE. THEY DO MAKE AN IMPACT IN OUR OFFICE AND OPERATIONS. THE NEXT IS, ON THE SIGN PERMITS. I'M NOT REALLY SURE THE SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNS , IT JUST WAS , WE TALKED ABOUT THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN. THERE WAS TOO MUCH CUTTING AND PASTING IS WHAT THREW EVERYTHING OFF. WE DO NOT CURRENTLY, WE NEVER HAVE AND WE DO NOT WANT TO IMPLEMENT IN THE FUTURE SIGNS TO HAVE SITE PLANT REQUIREMENTS, APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS. THE SIGN PERMIT, WE WANT PLANS OF THE SIGN AND WE WANT SOME KIND OF SURVEY THAT SHOWS ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY AND WHERE THAT SIGN IS GOING.
IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE A FULL SLATE PLAN. SO THIS LANGUAGE SAYS GIVE US THIS INFORMATION. WE NEED TWO COPIES OF THAT SIGN THE PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE.
THAT IS DELETING ALL THE SUCCESS OF A SITE PLAN. IT JUST WAS NOT WHAT WE INTENDED. SO THAT IS ALL OF THE AMENDMENTS WE ARE ASKING YOU TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL ON.
THIS IS PROPOSED TO GO TO THE MAY 6TH , SEVENTH? THE MAY 7 COUNCIL MEETING. THE FINAL ADOPTION OF THE SECOND COUNCIL MEETING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 1ST.
>> IS THIS OF THE STAFF HERE? OR IS THIS FREEZE NICHOLS? THIS IS A HUGE EFFORT. IT IS HARD TO IMAGINE WHAT IT ALL
ENTAILS. >> THE ORIGINAL UDO WAS PROBABLY 60/40. STAFF WAS VERY HEAVILY INVOLVED . WE ARE VERY
[00:20:02]
INVOLVED BECAUSE WE ARE IN THE COMMUNITY IN A WAY THEY DO NOT KNOW. THIS EFFORT HAS ALL BEEN STAFF ABOUT THE EFFORT BUT IT SEEMS LIKE IT WAS A LOT BUT IT REALLY WAS NOT. WE WERE REALLY GOOD. AS AN ISSUE CAME UP AND WE WERE, YOU KNOW, REVIEWING. I KEPT TELLING EVERYONE. EVENTUALLY, WE WILL ALL MEMORIZE THIS SPACE IN ORDER TO NOT GET THE CODES FLOATING AROUND IN OUR HEADS, IS THAT EVERY APPLICATION, GO REFERENCE THE ORDINANCE DID EVERYTHING -- EVERY TIME REFERENCED IT, WE ARE LOOKING AT IT AGAINST A PLAN. WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO SAY IN WHAT IS THE QUESTION? WHAT WOULD MARK AND HIGHLIGHT THOSE BUT IT WAS ACTUALLY REALLY EASY TO COMPILE ALL OF THIS BECAUSE WE HAD BEEN DOCUMENTING IT.>> A GREAT STAFF. ULTIMATELY, THERE WOULD BE A QUESTION. WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO SAY HERE? THAT IS SOMETHING TO FIX IT AND I WOULD ADD IT TO MY LIST. SO WE SAT IN MY OFFICE AND IT TOOK MAYBE TWO HOURS TO ACTUALLY GO THROUGH THE REDLINES BASED OFF
OF ALL OF OUR NOTES. >> CONGRATULATIONS.
>> THE ENTIRE UDO IS WORKING REALLY WELL, ESPECIALLY THE SITE NOTIFICATION PERMITS. AS YOU REMEMBER, THE OLD SITE PLAN, ANY NOTABLE REQUIRES AN ALL OR NOTHING. THE WHOLE SITE PLAN THAT HAD TO BRING THAT INTO COMPLETE PERFORMANCE, 100%. ANOTHER WE HAVE 30% THRESHOLD AND THE SITE MODIFICATION PERMIT, PEOPLE ARE REALLY HAPPY WHEN WE ARE NEGOTIATING. OKAY, YOU CAN BUILD THIS. YOU KNOW? THAT'S A SMALL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE , BUT WE NEED YOU TO FIX THIS SIDEWALK. YOU KNOW? AND A TREE INSTEAD OF THE WHOLE SITE PLAN . INSTEAD OF HAVING THE WHOLE THING BEING UPDATED SO IT IS WORKING REALLY, REALLY WELL? I'M CURIOUS ABOUT IN THE PREVIOUS MEETING. PROBABLY FOUR MEANINGS AGO. SOMEBODY HERE APPEALING FOR A MURAL. TO ADVERTISE THIS BUSINESS. I DO NOT SEE ANY LANGUAGE ABOUT A MURAL IN THESE DOCUMENTS
>> THERE'S A PUBLIC ART PROVISION. AND THE MAINSTREET DEPARTMENT IS WORKING ON A PUBLIC ART POLICY. AND SO IF THE PUBLIC, ONCE THEY ESTABLISH THAT POLICY, IF IT IS NOT MET THE DEFINITION, THAT IS THE SIGN WE -- BUT THAT DEFINITION OF WHAT IT IS AND HOW IT WILL BE ADMINISTERED, THAT IS STILL A SEPARATE POLICY BEING DEVELOPED BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .
>> WELL, IF THEY DO NOT DECIDE, SO IF IT IS NOT DECIDED TO BE PUBLIC ART, IT HAS TO PROVIDE BIBLE WALL SIGNS?
>> RIGHTS. >> I WILL GO AHEAD AND MAKE A
MOTION. >> WE HAVE TO GO TO PUBLIC
HEARING. >> OKAY. ARE THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR JULIE? IF NOT, WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME. WE DO NOT HAVE ANYBODY SO WE WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, I WILL ASK
FOR A MOTION. >> I WILL GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE GO AHEAD AND --
>> I WILL SECOND IT. >> I'VE A MOTION ON THE TABLE BY DR. HUNT AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER STALEY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE UDO AMENDMENTS, SAY AYE .
>> AYE. >> AND HE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
PASSES. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S DONE. SO WE WILL GO WITH THE
[D. Consent Agenda:]
CONSENT AGENDA. THERE ARE TWO ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TONIGHT. IT IS THE MINUTES FROM THE JANUARY 18TH MEETING AND SUPPLEMENTARY PLAT FOR INDUSTRIAL OBSERVE AT U.S. 59.I WILL GO AHEAD AND ASK FOR ANY MOTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS.
>> A MOTION TO APPROVE . TOOK THEM A MOTION ON THE TABLE TO APPROVE AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BROWN. ALL IN
FAVOR SAY AYE. >> AYE. TO MAKE ANY OPPOSED,
[E. Other Business:]
SAME SIGN . THAT PASSES. OKAY, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GO TO OTHER BUSINESS. MR. TYLER? YOU HAVE GOT THE PODIUM.WITHIN THE MONTH OF MARCH, 2024, THE CITY OF VICTORIA PROCESSED A TOTAL OF ONE THROUGH PERMITS AND A TOTAL OF 142 OVERALL COMBINED NEP PERMITS FOR THE CITY OF VICTORIA COLLECTED APPROXIMATELY $106,040 WITHIN THE MONTH OF MARCH, 2024. LAST YEAR IN MARCH OF 2023, THE CITY OF VICTORIA PROCESSED 155 PERMITS AS WELL AS A TOTAL OF 189 OVERALL COMBINED NAP PERMITS RED AND THE CITY OF
[00:25:02]
VICTORIA COLLECTED APPROXIMATELY $54,000 LAST YEAR, MARCH OF 2023. WITH AN INCREASE IN PERMIT FEES FROM LAST YEAR.WITHIN THE MONTH OF MARCH 2024, THE MOMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PROCESSED ONE MINOR PLAT, ONE MAJOR PLOT, TWO SITE PLANS, AND THEN WE DID AT THIS SECTION TO THE MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT REPORT THAT AT THE SITE MODIFICATION SECTION THAT JULIE WAS JUST TALKING ABOUT. FIVE OF THOSE WITHIN THEM ARE
-- MONTH OF MARCH 2024. 20. >> ALL RIGHT. NOW THE NEXT
[F. Items from Planning Commissioners:]
THING ON THE AGENDA IS ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS.THE MEETING ABOUT THE STATUTES WANTED TO CLARIFY ] SO THE STATUTES ARE 60 INCHES TALL. -- IS 80 INCHES TALL. NOBODY KNOWS THE EXACT TYPE. SO IT WAS A ESTIMATION.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BE OVER SIX FEET.
>> -- DID A FULL SIX FEET IN HEIGHT.
>> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR THAT. THAT IS GREAT. WE DO NOT HAVE ANYMORE BUSINESS , I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THIS MEETING AT
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.