[A. CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:05] >> OKAY. >> WELL, GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR AUGUST 18TH, 2022. WE'VE GOT A FULL AGENDA TONIGHT AND I'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. AND LYLA, ROLL CALL? >> CALDWELL? >> PRESENT. HOAD? >> PRESENT. >> DERRICK HUNT IN >> HERE. >> DAN MIKULENKA? >> PRESENT. >> MONICA RODRIQUEZ? >> PRESENT. >> BRIAN ROKYTA? >> PRESENT. >> CINDY STALEY. >> WE HAVE A QUORUM. AND TONIGHT'S MEETING IS BEING BROADCAST. DO WE HAVE CITIZENS HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEMS NOT LISTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING? SEEING NO ONE, OKAY, THEN WE'LL MOVE ON. OUR FIST ITEM IS [1. ANNOUNCEMENT/REMINDERS] LINN'S ADDITION RESUBDIVISION NO. 12. >> I HAVE AN ANNOUNCEMENT. IT'S A THANK YOU TO YOU, IF Y'ALL DON'T KNOW, OUR CHAIR GAIL HOAD'S SECOND TERM IS EXPIRING AT THE END OF THE MONTH AND THIS WILL BE HER LAST MEETING AND WE JUST WANT TO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR SERVICE, SHE'S BEEN ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION SINCE 2017 SERVING TWO TERMS AND WE WILL MISS YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU SO MUCH, WE APPRECIATE YOU AND I DO HAVE THIS PLAQUE. >> AND YOU SAVED THE BIGGEST MEETING FOR ME, RIGHT, THE LAST ONE? [1. Variance Request for Linn's Addition Resubdivision No. 12 - City Plat ...] >> THANK YOU. >> OKAY. SO, NOW WE WILL MOVE TO THE FIRST ITEM WHICH IS A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR LINN'S ADDITION RESUBDIVISION NO. 12. CAN WE HAVE THE STAFF REPORT. >> GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA TODAY IS A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR LINN'S ADDITION RESUBDIVISION NO. 12 PARISH SCHOOL AND TRINITY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED THE 406 WEST IS SAN ANTONIO STREET AND 1402 NORTH VINE STREET. OVER MULTIPLE LOTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER WISHES TO EXPAND THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY. AS PART OF THE EXPANSION, THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD LIKE THE REPLATTE THE PROPERTY INTO A SINGLE QUASI PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL LOT. THE OWNER'S REQUESTING VARIANCES TO 21-23 A 4 AND 6 IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR THE APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT DEPICTING FRONT AND EXTERIOR SET BACKS 9 FEET ALONG WEST SAN ANTONIO STREET, NORTH VINE STREET, WEST QUADALUPE STREET AND NORTH. 20 FEET AND 25 FOOT BUILDING SETBACK LINES TO 9 FOOT SETBACKS ALONG NORTH SAN ANTONIO, WEST VINE, NORTH QUADALUPE STREET. ALL EXISTING STREETS. 12 IS A PROPOSED FINAL PLAT OF 1.87 ACRES. THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY EXISTS AS A QUASILY PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL LOT, THE PROPERTY IS BEING REPLATTED INTO A QUASI PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL LOT. WEST SAN ANTONIO STREET NORTH VINE STREET WEST QUADALUPE STREET AND NORTH MOODY STREET. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC SHOULD PUBLIC UTILITIES NEED TO BE REPAIRED, RELOCATED OR EXPANDED. ACCESS TO THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE ON SAN ANTONIO STREET, NORTH VINE STREET AND MODEDY STREET. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT DEPICTING 9 FOOT FRONT EXTERIOR YARD SETBACKS BELOW THE MINIMUM 25 FOOT SET BACKS FOR A QUASI DEVELOPMENT. STAFF HAS DETERMINED THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS BEEN DEVELOPED AND HAS BEEN LONG EXISTED IN IT'S CURRENT USE AS AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION. THE REDUCTION OF THE BUILDING SETBACKS WILL NOT BE A DETRIMENT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHOSE BUILDINGS SETBACKS WERE ESTABLISHED BEFORE OUR CURRENT CODE OF ORDINANCES. IN PREPARING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO THOSE SURROUNDING PROPERTY, 9-FOOT BUILDING SET BACKS DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE ESTABLISHED LINES LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THUS CONFORMS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. STAFF DETERMINED IT IS BENEFICIAL TO GRANT THE VARIANCE IN ORDER TO ASSIST THE PRESERVATION OF THE AESTHETICS OF ONE OF THE CITY'S HISTORICAL DISTRICTS. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE APPROVAL OF THE [00:05:03] FINAL PLAT OF LINN'S ADDITION RESUBDIVISION NO. 12 ON THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCES BY COUNCIL. THANK YOU. >> OKAY. I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION. DOES ANYBODY WANT TO COME FORWARD? >> OKAY. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS? >> OKAY. IF NOT, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? >> MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST. >> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. A SECOND? >> I'LL SECOND. >> A MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. (CHORUS OF AYES) >> ANY OPPOSED? >> OKAY. MOTION PASSES. >> THE SECOND ITEM IS A [2. Variance Request for Trinity Episcopal Church and School Site Plan - 4...] VARIANCE REQUEST FOR TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND SCHOOL, CAN WE HAVE THE STAFF REPORT ON THAT, PLEASE. >> OUR SECOND ITEM ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT IS A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL AND SITE PLAN LOCATED ON 406 VICTORY TEXAS AND CONSISTED OF A COMBINED 3.65 ACRES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS KNOWN AND DEVELOPED AS TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND SCHOOL. THE OWNERS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 21-92 A IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE IN 2016, PORTABLE BUILDINGS WERE PRAYED ON THE CHURCH SIDE OF TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH. THIS WAS DONE TO PROVIDE THE GROWING NEEDS OF THE SCHOOL. A PERMANENT ADDITION TO BE BUILT ON THE SCHOOL SITE AT 406 WEST SAN ANTONIO STREET. THIS WILL AVOID STUDENTS HAVING TO CROSS THE STREET SEVERAL TIMES A DAY ON A REGULAR BASIS THROUGHOUT THE SCHOOL YEAR. A TOTAL OF 73 PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED. THIS WILL HAVE A PARKING DEFICIT OF 63. DUE TO THE DIFFERENCE IN PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION AND THE NATURE OF EXISTING USES IN THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF A GRID SYSTEM OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, THIS VARIANCE IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE SDPISING DEVELOPED AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO ALLOW THE APPROVAL OF THE REDUCTION OF THE REQUIRED OFF STREET PARKING FACILITIES. TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL REQUIRED TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH HAS A TOTAL OF 2 296 SANCTUARY SEATS. A TOTAL OF 73 PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED LEAVING A PARKING DEFICIT OF 63 SPACES. BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERENCE OF PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION, AND THE NATURE OF EXISTING USE, STAFF BELIEVES THIS USE IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE EXISTING SURROUNDING AREA. THE SCHOOL AND CHURCH ARE ALSO LOCATED IN A PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL AREA WHERE THE EXISTING GRID SYSTEM IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO HANDLE THE TRAFFIC GENERATED BY THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES IN ADDITION TO THE TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND SCHOOL USES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE AT TRINITY EPISCOPAL NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND CHURCH. THANK YOU. >> OKAY. WE'LL NOW OPEN FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS VARIANCE, ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK? >> OKAY. IF NOT, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> HAS THERE BEEN A STUDY FOR THE PARKING BY THE TRINITY? YOU KNOW, THEY'RE GOING TO BE LOSING 63 DEFICIT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, SOMEBODY'S LOOKING AT THIS, BECAUSE, HAS ANYBODY? >> THIS SITE HAS NEVER MET THE CURRENT PARKING REGULATIONS, YOU KNOW THAT CHURCH WAS DEVELOPED A LONG TIME AGO, I BELIEVE IN THE '60S AND THE SCHOOL AFTER THAT. AND IF YOU LOOK AT IT INDEPENDENTLY, THEY BOTH HAVE SUFFICIENT PARKING WHEN YOU LOOK AT JUST THE CHURCH USE OR THE JUST THE SCHOOL USE. BUT WHEN YOU COMBINE THEM THAT'S WHEN YOU HAVE A PARKING REQUIREMENT THAT'S EXCESSIVE BECAUSE WHEN SCHOOL'S IN SESSION, THERE'S RARELY ANY USE OF THE CHURCH, YOU MAY HAVE AN OCCASIONAL FUNERAL, BUT, REALLY BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERENCE IN PEAK HOURS AS HE WAS SAYING, YOU KNOW, SUNDAYS AND SATURDAYS WHEN YOU HAVE CHURCH AND MONDAY-FRIDAY WHEN YOU HAVE SCHOOL, INDEPENDENTLY, THERE'S ENOUGH PARKING FOR THE OVERALL SITE. >> HAS THE NEIGHBORHOOD, DO THE NEIGHBORS -- >> WE DO NOT RECEIVE COMPLAINTS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THERE OF COURSE, IS A LOT OF STREET PARKING. >> OH, YEAH, I WENT BY THERE AWHILE AGO JUST TO BE SURE THAT [00:10:04] I HAVE A FEEL OF WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE TONIGHT. >> I KNOW THAT ON THOSE OCCASIONS WHERE, DURING THE SCHOOL DAY, THERE MIGHT BE SOMETHING GOING ON AT THE CHURCH AS WELL, USUALLY IT'S UM, A BIG FUNERAL, AND THEY OVERFLOW ON TO THE STREET ANYHOW, THEY WOULD OVERFLOW ON TO THE STREET EVEN IF THE SCHOOL WENT FACTORED IN. >> I AGREE. >> THE FACT IS THE ONLY TIME FROM A SCHOOL STAND POINT IT BECOMES AN ISSUE IS DURING GRANDPARENTS DAY. AND THEN THERE'S PARKING, THEY'RE ALL OVER THE PLACE. >> THEY MAY BE ON MOODY STREET. >> WE DON'T RECOMMEND BUILDING PARKING FOR RARE PEAK TIMES THAT YOU WOULD HAVE A SPECIAL EVENT. PARKING SHOULD BE BUILT FOR EVERYDAY USE AND FOR EVERYDAY USE THEY HAVE SUFFICIENT FOR BOTH USES. >> I'M EXCITED FOR TRINITY. I THINK IT'S A GREAT THING. IT'S AWESOME, I JUST WANTED TO ASK QUESTIONS, KNOWING THAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT ALL OF THOSE THINGS. IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE MAKE SURE TO PLAN AHEAD AND WE'RE DOING THAT AND THAT'S A GOOD THING. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> IF NOT, WELL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THIS VARIANCE. >> MOTION TO APPROVE THIS VARIANCE. >> WE HAVE A MOTION, A SECOND? >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. (CHORUS OF AYES) >> ALL OPPOSED? >> OKAY. MOTION PASSES. [3. Variance Request for Davis Subdivision NO. 3 - City Plat File NO. 2112...] >> OKAY. OUR THIRD ITEM IS VARIANCE REQUEST FOR FOR DAVIS SUBDIVISION NUMBER 3. . >> OUR THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR DAVIS SUBDI SUBDIVISION THREE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1205 SOUTH EAST STREET IN VICTORIA, TEXAS. THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD LIKE TO DEMOLISH THEIR EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND BUILD A NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE IN IT'S PLACE ON THEIR LOT. THE OWNER HAS BEEN GIVEN A CONDITIONAL OFFER TO FUND THE DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON THEIR PROPERTY. THE DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE REQUIRES A PLAT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ORDER FOR THE BUILDING PERMITS TO BE ISSUED. THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD LIKE TO PLAT THE PROPERTY INTO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT. PLAT THE PROPERTY INTO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT WITH THE LOT WIDTH BEING BELOW THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT OF THE LOT. THE CODE OF ORDER LOT ONE WILL HAVE AN APPROXIMATELY MINIMUM LOT WITH A 46 FEET. LOT ONE WILL BE ABLE TO ADHERE TO ALL THE GUIDELINES REQUIRED OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT DESPITE BEING BELOW THE MINIMUM LOT WITH REQUIREMENT. IT ALSO MEETS ALL YARD SETBACKS AND WILL ADHERE TO ALL THE YARD SETBACKS ESTABLISHED WITH THE REPLATTE. THE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE WOULD ALLOW THE PROPERTY OWNER TO PLAT THE PROPERTY INTO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT THE VARIANCE WILL AWE LAW FOR LOT 1 TO BE CREATED WITH AN PROXIMATE LOT WITH 46 FEET, WHILE MEETING ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE CITY CODE FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS. THE DAVIS SUBDIVISION NUMBER 3 IS A PROPOSED FINAL PLAT OF THE VARIANCE WILL ALLOW THE LOT WIDTH TO BE BELOW THE MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENT WHILE MEETING ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE CITY CODE. THE PROPERTY IS DEVELOPEDND A HAS EXISTED IN IT'S CURRENT CONFIGURATION FOR YEARS, STAFF DETERMINED THE APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE WOULD NOT SHAPING THE EXISTING CHARACTER TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND NOT DETRIMENTAL TO SURROUNDING LOTS. FURTHER MORE, OUR ANALYSIS SUGGESTS THAT ALAWING FUNDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENTIAL VARIANCE AND PLAT BE APPROVED. THE CITY OF VICTORIA COOPERATING WITH OTHER GOVERNMENT BUT ALSO ALAWING RESOURCES TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO IT'S CITIZENS WHO NEED THEM. STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF DAVIS SUBDIVISION NUMBER 3, CONDITIONED UPON THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BY CITY COUNCIL. >> OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING? >> SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? [00:15:01] >> IF NOT, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> I'LL MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE VARIANCE. >> I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN [4. Variance Request for Victoria Town Center - City Plat File NO. 220205 ...] FAVOR SAY AYE. (CHORUS OF AYES) AYE. >> MOTION PASSES. NOW, TO THE FOURTH ITEM WHICH IS A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE VICTORIA TOWN CENTER. SGLSH THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED 6512 AND 6404 NORTHEAST ZACH LIENS PARKWAY AND A 9.30 ACRE VACANT LOT THAT ARE TO BE THE PROPOSED FUTURE PAD SITES FOR A PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER DEVELOPMENT. THE OWNER IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR THE APPROVAL TO ERECT AN OFF PREMISE, MULTITENANT FREE STANDING SIGN AND ONE FREE STANDING SIGN ON EACH PROPOSED PAD SITE WHILE EXCEEDING THE ALLOWABLE FOOTAGE FOR PERMANENT STANDING SINGLE SIGN ON A LOT. INDIVIDUAL SPECIAL PAD SITES. THE FUTURE SHOPPING CENTER DEVELOPMENT SITE AND PAD SITES WILL BE DEVELOPED WITH FUTURE RETAIL, OFFICE, AND OR FOO ESTABLISHMENTS. DUE TO THE LIMITED FRONTAGE OF 100 FEET ON WHILE THE PROPOSED FUTURE PAD SITE FOUR WILL HAVE A LOT FRONTAGE OF 197 SQUARE FEET, SETTING THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THEIR SIGNAGE. THE PROPOSED MULTITENANT FREE STANDING SIGN HAS A CUMULATIVE AREA OF 420 SQUARE FEET. THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER HAS REQUESTED THE ABOVE DESCRIBED VARIANCE SHALL TO ALLOW MULTITENANT SIGNS THAT PROVIDE SIGNAGE TO THE FUTURE RETAIL OFFICES AND OR FOOD ENTITIES WITHIN THE REAR PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. FURTHER MORE, A THIRD PROPOSED PILE ON SIGN IS TO BE LOCATED IN THE VICTORIA RIGHT-OF-WAY NEXT TO THE INDIAN TRAIL SUBDIVISION SECTION ONE DEVELOPMENT. THIS PROPOSED SIGNAGE WILL BE AUTHORIZED UNDER A RIGHT-OF-WAY LICENSE AGREEMENT AND IS NOT A PART OF THIS VARIANCE REQUEST. MULTIPLE TENANT FREE STANDING PILE ON SIGN AND AN ON PREMISE FREE STANDING PILE ON SIGN AT 6512 AND 65. A FREE STANDING MULTITENANT SIGN WILL BE ALLOWED ON THE PARKWAY LOT AS IT IS PLAT THE CURRENTLY, BUT THE PROPOSED SIZE OF THE MULTITENANT SIGN WILL EXCEED THE MAXIMUM AREA ALLOWED FOR THE SIGN. IT IS THE BEST INTEREST OF THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER TO PURSUE THE VARIANCE FOR SIGNAGE NOW IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE ORDERERLY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FUTURE SHOPPING DEVELOPMENT AND THE SITES. OVERALL SIGNAGE PLAN AND THEN IMPAIRED THE INDIVIDUAL LOT FRONTAGES. THE DEVELOPMENT EXISTS OF EIGHT LOTS, ONE BEEN AN INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL SITE LOT. AND STAFF DETERMINED THE FUTURE PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER AND INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL PAD SITES COMBINED WILL 2,051 FEET OF FRONTAGE. THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER HAS A PROPOSED SIGNAGE PLAN TO ALLOW PAD SITE TWO AND FOUR TO ERECT ONE MULTIPLE TENANT FREE STANDING SIGN WITH A CUMULATIVE AREA OF 400 SQUARE FEET EACH. ADDITIONAL FREE STANDING SIGN WHICH WOULD BE AN ON PREMISE FREE STANDING SIGN NOT EXCEEDING 120 SQUARE FEET AND NO HIGHER THAN 35 FEET IN HEIGHT. ONE ON PREMISES FREE STANDING SIGN WITH A CUMULATIVE AREA OF 100 SQUARE FEET AND ALSO BE NO HIGHER THAN 35 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER LOT, THOUGH IT HAS LIMITED FRONTAGE ON ZACH LANDS PARKWAY WILL NOT BE ON THE LOT. THE DEVELOPMENT ONLY UTILIZES APPROXIMATELY 1540 SQUARE FEET OF TOTAL SIGNAGE FOR THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE PLAN IS UTILIZING OVER AFTER THE ALLOTTED SIGNAGE SUPPORTING. ADDITIONALLY, FREE STANDING SIGNAGE ALONG THE SECTION OF ZACH LANDS PARK WAY FRONTAGE IS ALLOWED TO BE 50 FEET IN HEIGHT. STAFF FURTHER [00:20:01] RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THESE VARIANCES SUBJECT THE CONDITION THAT THE SIGNS BE ERECT SE AS PER THE PLAN PERMITTED AS THE OVERALL SIGNAGE PLAN. THANK YOU. >> ONCE AGAIN WE'LL OPEN FOR PUBLIC HEARING. >> SEEING NO ONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THAT'S A LOT OF INFORMATION, DO WE HA ANY QUESTIONS? >> TO BREAK IT DOWN IN A LITTLE SIMPLER WAY, ESSENTIALLY, THE AMOUNT OF SIGNAGE SOMEONE'S ALLOWED IS BASED OFF OF THEIR FRONTAGE, SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ENTIRE SITE OF 2,000 FEET IN FRONTAGE, THEY'RE ALLOWED OVER 2,000 FEET IN SIGNAGE. THERE ARE SOME LOTS THAT WILL EXCEED IT WITH THE MULTI-TENANT SIGNS. OVERALL, IT'S LESS SIGNS AND ALL THE SIGNS WILL BE SHORTER AS BEING PROPOSED TO BE 35 FEET INSTEAD OF WHAT IS NORMALLY ALLOWED AT 50 FEET. IN TOTALITY, IT'S LESS SIGNAGE THAN THEY WERE ALLOWED BY RIGHT, BUT, BECAUSE THE FRONTAGE BEING JUST THEIR DRIVEWAY AND NOT HAVING A LOT OF FRONTAGE FOR THE REAR DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR THAT LARGER SIGN, IT MADE SENSE TO RECOMMEND THE VARIANCE. >> ARE WE LOOKING AT A TOTAL OF THREE SIGNS? >> YES. THREE SIGNS AND EACH PAD SITES WILL HAVE THEIR OWN BUT SMALLER AT 100 FEET. >> I THINK, ALSO, WHAT IT DOES FOR YOU, YOU KNOW WHAT THE SIGNS WILL LOOK LIKE. AND THEY LOOK ATTRACTIVE, SO IT GIVES YOU BECAUSE OF THE APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE, IT ALLOWS YOU TO HAVE THAT LITTLE BIT OF IN IT. >> IT WILL BE A DOUBLE HAMMER, WE'LL HAVE THE VARIANCE WITH RESOLUTION WHEN PEOPLE COME IN FOR PERMIT, BUT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS PUTTING THAT INTO THEIR DEED RESTRICTIONS OR DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS WHEN THEY SELL THE PAD SITES SO WE'LL BE DOUBLY COVERED. >> OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. >> IF NOT, I'LL ASK FOR A MOTION ON THIS. >> BY MY COUNT, THE SIGNAGE SPOTS THAT THEY HAVE ON THE PYLON SITES, IT'S MORE THAN WHAT THEY HAVE IN THE PAD SITES AND UNITS THAN WHAT ARE GOING TO BE USED IN THE STRIP MALL. DOES THAT COME INTO PLAY AT ALL? >> NO. THAT'S WHY WE'RE SAYING BECAUSE OF THE THAT'S WHAT THE VARIANCE IS FOR, YOU HAVE AN OFF PREMISE AND ANOTHER FREE-STANDING SIGN ON THE PAD SITES THAT HAVE THE MULTI-TENANT SIGNS. >> AND I TRIED TO LOOK IT UP AND I COULDN'T FIND IT. DO YOU HAVE SOME WAY, TO ENSURE, POTENTIALLY, IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE PADS 4-6 ARE RENTED. DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING IN THE ORDINANCE THAT ENSURES THAT THE SIGN ISN'T JUST GOING TO BE BIG OPEN SPOTS WHERE THEY DECIDE. >> HE'S NOT GOING TO CONSTRUCT THE SIGNS. THE ONLY SIGNS THAT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ARE THE MULTI-TENANT SIGNS, SO, THERE'LL BE OPEN SPOTS ON THE OPEN TENANT SIGNS UNTIL HE FINISHES OUT THE PAD SITES. BUT THE INDIVIDUAL 100-FOOT SIGNS WON'T BE ERECTED UNTIL THERE'S A BUILDING PERMIT FOR BUILDING ASSOCIATED WITH THAT. >> RIGHT, I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT, WHAT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT IS THAT WE'VE GOT THIS BIG 35-FOOT PYLON WITH TWO BUSINESSES AND THE REST OF IT, THERE'S OPENINGS WHERE EVER THEY DON'T HAVE A SIGN PUT UP. AND WHERE I'VE SEEN THAT BEFORE, IT'S VERY UNATTRACTIVE VERSUS HAVING A PANEL WITHOUT SIGNAGE, BUT AT LEAST FILLS IN. >> OH, NO, THERE'LL BE A BLANK FACE. AND THAT'S WHAT'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS, THOSE ARE BLANK FACES. OUR ORDINANCE REQUIRES THOSE SPACES TO BE BLANK. SO, THEY'RE MISSING OUT OF SPACE, THEY'RE IN VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE. >> OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF NOT WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE OR NOT? >> OKAY, MOTION TO APPROVE, SECOND? >> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE AND SECONDED, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. [D. Consent Agenda:] >> (CHORUS OF AYES) >> ANY OPPOSED. >> OKAY. NOW WE'RE MOVING ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. THERE ARE FOUR ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WHICH ARE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 16TH, 2022, MEETING. FINAL PLAT FOR LINN'S ADDITION RESUBDIVISION NO. 12. FINAL PLAT FOR DAVIS SUBDIVISION NUMBER 3 AND FINAL PLAT FOR ESCALRA RANCH. CAN I HAVE A MOTION ON THESE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. [1. Monthly Development Report] >> OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. >> [00:25:03] (CHORUS OF AYES) >> MOTION PASSES. >> MOVING ON, MONTHLY DEVELOPMENT REPORT. >> >> WITHIN THE MONTH OF JULY, THE CITY OF VICTORIA PROTESTED TWO MINOR PLAT, ONE MAJOR PLAT, AND THREE SITE PLANS. ALSO, WITHIN THE MONTH OF JULY, THE CITY OF VICTORIA ISSUED A TOTAL OF 144 PERMITS, AS WELL AS 223 COMBINED MEP PERMITS. THE CITY OF VICTORIA COLLECTED APPROXIMATELY $53,300 IN PERMIT FEES IN JULY. THANK YOU. >> OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS? >> OKAY. ANY OTHER ITEMS FROM COMMISSIONERS? >> OKAY. SEEING NO OTHER BUSINESS. >> I JUST WANT TO WISH YOU A GREAT WHATEVER YOU GOING TO DO. >> OH, I'VE ALREADY GOT PEOPLE ASKING ME TO DO OTHER THINGS. SO, I WILL BE BUSY. >> OKAY. WE'RE * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.