May 20, 2021 Planning Commission

[A. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:08]

COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER PLEASE. WELCOME ANYBODY WHO WAS HERE.

ONE E ANNOUNCEMENT. THE MEETING ENDS BEING SIMULTANEOUSLY TELEVISED ON TV 15 IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO WATCH T OR I THINK IT COMES UP PERIODICALLY AFTER THAT ON A ROUTINE BASIS. DOES THE STAFF HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS?

[1. ANNOUCEMENT/REMINDERS: Live public access is available on TV15.]

>> GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS WE DO HAVE A COUPLE ANNOUNCEMENTS.

I WANTED TO INTRODUCE OUR NEW PLANNER THAT WE HAVE HIRED WITH THE CITY.

HER NAME IS BRITNEY SCHAAL. SHE GRADUATED FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA WITH A BACHELORS IN URBAN STUDIES. BRITNEY, DO YOU WANT TO STAND UP.

>> HI EVERYONE. >> HELLO. >> NICE TO HAVE YOU.

>> CONGRATULATIONS. >> WELCOME ABOARD. >> OUR SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT IS WE ARE THE ITEM C4 4 PUBLIC HEARING WAS NOTICE WHICH WAS THE TEXAS HIDDEN SUBDIVISION.

HOWEVER THE OWNER HAS WITHDRAWN THE REQUEST SO WE WILL BRING THAT TO YOU AT ANOTHER TIME.

I WANTED TO MAKE THAT FOR THE RECORD SINCE WE ALREADY NOTICED IT.

>> THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I LIKE TO ORGANIZE ANY CITIZENS IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA.

SEEING NONE WILL MOVE ON TO OUR FIRST ITEM IS A VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE ORIGINAL

[1. Variance Request for Original Townsite Resubdivision No. 91 - City Pla...]

>> ASK ABOUT GOOD EVENING AGAIN COMMISSIONERS. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED AT 101 AND 105 S. WILLIAM STREET BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE ORIGINAL TOWNSITE RESUBDIVISION NUMBER 90 1 O'CLOCK 143, LOT 1R AND 4R. THE CURRENT PROPERTY EXISTED AS A SINGLE COMMERCIAL LOT. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO REPOT THE PROPERTY INTO 2 COMMERCIAL LOTS WITH ONE LOT BEING BELOW THE MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENT OF 100 FEET WIDE FOR A COMMERCIAL LOT. THEY ARE ACTUALLY ASKING FOR LOT 1 ARE TO HAVE A LOT WITH OF THE 72.35 FEET. IT IS BEING DEVELOPED INTO 2 OFFSTREET PARKING SITES. THE GRANTING OF THE VARIANCE WOULD ALLOW FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER TO PLOT THIS PROPERTY INTO 2 COMMERCIAL LOTS THE VARIANCE WOULD ALLOW FOR LOT 1 ARE TO BE CREATED WITHOUT LOT WIDTH OF 72.35 FEET WHILE MEETING ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS. LOT FOR ART MEETS ALL THE MINIMUM STANDARDS AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY VARIANCES. THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE ORIGINAL RESUBDIVISION NUMBER 91 IS PROPOSED FINAL PLAT OF .887 ACRES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 101 AND 105 S. WILLIAM STREET AND LIES WITHIN THE CITY'S CORPORATE CITY LIMITS.

THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY EXISTS AS A COMMERCIAL LOT AND IS BEING REPOTTED INTO 2 COMMERCIAL LOTS. ACCESS TO THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE FROM EAST SANTA ROSA STREET, SOUTH WILLIAM STREET AND EAST CONSTITUTION ALL EXISTING LOCAL STREETS.

THE FINAL PLAT WILL MEET ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES WITH APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR THE REPOT OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL LOT INTO THE NEW 2 COMMERCIAL LOTS WITH THE ONE LOT, ONE ARE BEING BELOW THE MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENT. THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN DEVELOPED AND HAS EXISTED AS THIS COMMERCIAL LOT CONFIGURATION FOR YEARS.TAFF HAS DETERMINED ALLOWING THE SUBDIVISION OF THE LOT INTO THE SUIT TO COMMERCIALS FOR THE PROPOSED OFFSTREET PARKING LOT WOULD NOT SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE THE EXISTING CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE SURROUNDING THOUGHTS. IT WOULD ALLOW FOR ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. FURTHERMORE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA WHERE THE MINIMUM COMMERCIAL LOT STANDARDS ARE EXCESSIVE FOR THAT CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING BUILT IN ENVIRONMENT.

STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE ORIGINAL TOWNSITE RESUBDIVISION NUMBER ONE CONDITIONED UPON THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE BY CITY COUNCIL.

>> THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME WOULD LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? SEEING NONE WILL PUT CLOTHES THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IS THERE

ANY DISCUSSION OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS? >> I JUST HAD A QUESTION.

JUST A GENERAL QUESTION. IT WAS DIRECTED TOWARD STAFF. >> SURE.

>> IF THERE WAS EVER A NUMBER THAT WOULD NEVER GET APPROVED FOR VARIANCES LIKE AS FAR AS FEET WISE LIKE IF IT WAS 72 BUT IF IT WAS LIKE 50 OR 40. I'M ASKING NOT JUST FOR

[00:05:05]

>> THAT IS CORRECT. WE WOULD LOOK AT EACH INDIVIDUAL VARIANCE ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS. SO FOR INSTANCE IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, SOME COMMERCIAL LOTS OF BEEN ESTABLISHED WITH THE MINIMUM OF 25 FEET TO 40 TO 50. WE WOULD JUST HAVE TO LOOK AT HOW IT HAS BEEN EXISTING AND HOW IT WOULD AFFECT THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES SHOULD IT BE GRANTED. ASK THANK YOU.> WE ULTIMATELY LOOK AT THE DEVELOPMENT ABILITY OF THE PROPERTY AND WHAT ARE THE PLANS TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY.

>> THANK YOU.> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? DO WE HAVE IN A MOTION TO ADOPT

THE VARIANCE? >> I MOVED TO ADOPT IT. >> I WILL SECOND.

>> ALL IN FAVOR, SAY I TO. >> I. >> WE NEED TO TAKE ACTION ON

APPROVING THE FINAL PLAN. >> THE FINAL PLAT WOULD BE? >> MY CONSENT.

[2. Variance Request and Preliminary Plat for The Ranches of TerraVista - ...]

PLEASE. >> THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE END OF THE CHAIR OF EASTER RANCH ROAD PHASE 1. IT'S LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS BEING 12.4 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE JOSC) CARBAJAL GRANT ABSTRACT 12 AND BEING A PORTION OF THE LEVITE COMPANIES SUBDIVISION IN VICTORIA COUNTY TEXAS. THE VARIANCE, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS LOOKING FOR A VARIANCE ON ALLOWING ONE ACCESS POINT FOR A SUBDIVISION THAT IS GOING TO HAVE OVER 50 LOTS. CURRENTLY OUR ORDINANCE STANDS THAT ANY SUBDIVISION OVER 50 LOTS IS REQUIRED TO HAVE 2 POINTS OF ACCESS TO A PUBLIC ROADWAY.

THIS IS CURRENTLY A PHASED SUBDIVISION. CURRENTLY THE FIRST SUBDIVISION IN PHASE 1 WAS PLOTTED IN 2014. WITH 38 LOTS. THE NEW PHASE 2 IS LOOKING TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL 16 PUTTING THEM AT 54. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE SECOND POINT OF ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY PURPOSES. AT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS PROPOSING A 20 FOOT PAVED EMERGENCY ACCESS POINT BETWEEN LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK FOR A PHASE 2 TO THE ADJACENT UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED SECOND EMERGENCY ACCESS POINT WILL ALLOW FOR THE CONNECTION ACCESS TO BE MADE ONCE THE ADJACENT PROPERTY DEVELOPS. THE PROPOSED EMERGENCY ACCESS WILL CONNECT TO BIANCHI DRIVE.

I'M GONNA GET THE PLOT UP THERE SO YOU ALL CAN SEE THE PROPOSED.

THE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE WHEREBY THE PROPERTY OWNER TO PLOT PHASE 2 WAS 16 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND TO HOA COMMON AREAS. THE VARIANCE WILL ALLOW FOR THE FULLY DEVELOPED 2-PHASE SUBDIVISION TO BE PLOTTED WITH ONLY ONE ACCESS POINT TO THE PUBLIC ROADWAY WHILE CONTAINING MORE THAN 50 LOTS. THE PRELIMINARY PLOT, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF TERRA VISA RANCH ROAD AND CHISHOLM TRAIL. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 12.404 ACRE TRACT.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY'S CORPORATE CITY LIMITS.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSES TO PLOT THE PROPERTY INTO 16 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 2 COMMON AREA LOTS DESCRIBED. DEDICATED TO THE HOA. THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLOT DEPICTS THE FUTURE DEDICATION OF 60 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRED FOR THE EXTENSION OF ONE LOCAL STREET WHICH IS TERRA VISA RANCH ROAD. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT SHOWS A DEDICATION OF 17.5 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE FUTURE EXPANSION OF BIANCHI DRIVE.

ACCESS TO THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE FROM TERRA VISA RANCH ROAD. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLOT OF A MULTIPHASE SUBDIVISION TO ONLY ONE ACCESS POINT TO A PUBLIC ROADWAY WHILE CONTAINING MORE THAN 50 LOTS. CONDITION UPON PROVIDING A SECONDARY EMERGENCY 20 FOOT PAVED ACCESS POINT TO THE FULLY DEVELOPED SUBDIVISION. THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE SUPPORTS THIS RECOMMENDATION. STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS THE APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE RANGES OF TERRA VISA PHASE 2 CONDITION UPON THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED

VARIANCE BY CITY COUNCIL. >> THANK YOU, ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? AT THIS TIME WOULD LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AGENDA ITEM.

IS OR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNSEL IN THIS AGENDA ITEM? XC-WE WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND OPENED IT FOR DISCUSSION.

>> LOOKS TO ME WHAT YOU'RE DOING HERE IS YOU'RE NOT MAKING A STREET YOU'RE MAKING

[00:10:02]

SOMETHING ONE NOTCH ABOVE AN ALLEY? >> IS A 20 FOOT PAVED TO ALLOW

FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES TO GET IN AND OUT IF NECESSARY. >> AND I WILL BE FOR A STREET

IN THE FUTURE TO BE LOCATED I ASSUME? >> YES EVENTUALLY WHEN THAT UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY DOES HAVE DECIDES ON WHAT TO DEVELOPMENT THAT 20 FOOT PAVED WILL BE TRANSITIONED INTO A FULL PAVED ROAD. TO ALLOW THAT SECOND ACCESS

POINT. WHO OWNS PROPERTY IN THERE? >> A PORTION OF IT WOULD TRANSITION TO IN A FULLY PAVED ROAD. THE PORTION BETWEEN 2 HOUSES OR THE 2 LOTS WOULD STILL BE A 20 FOOT BASICALLY DRIVEWAY THAT MEETS THE ACCESS EASEMENT FOR FIRE TRUCK.> WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THAT?

>> HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. >> OKAY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HAS TO TAKE CARE OF

IT. OKAY. >> A LITTLE BIT CONFUSED.

IT'S HIS FUTURE FILING CONNECTIVITY TO BIANCHI DRIVE. IT WOULD JUST WIND AROUND HERE AND COME BACK UP AND HIT BIANCHI DRIVE NORTH ON THE NORTH SIDE?

>> YOU CAN SEE HOW IT'S CURVED LINEAR. >> YEAH, CURVES AROUND.

>> HAVE A SIMILAR SITUATION OF HAVING THE 20 FOOT SEPARATING OR BETWEEN 2 LOTS AND WILL END INTO AN ACTUAL ROAD THAT IS PROPOSED AS THE REST OF THE LAND IS DEVELOPED INTO A FUTURE PHASE THERE WILL BE ACCESS TO BIANCHI WITH A PUBLIC ROAD ACCESS TO BIANCHI.

THAT ACCESS EASEMENT WILL SPILL OUT INTO A PUBLIC ROAD. >> IS OR ANY OTHER ACCESS SIMILAR TO THIS WITHIN THE SAME SUBDIVISION OR IS THIS THE ONLY ONE OF ITS KIND?

>> WE HAVE DONE THESE EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS I KNOW IN THE PAST.

I'M HAVING A HARD TIME, TO BE CAPSTONE HAS ONE? I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THERE'S ANY OTHER IN TERRA VISTA. THERE HAS BEEN SOME IN THE PAST.

>> OTHER SUBDIVISION SPIRIT. >> OF THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THIS ARE THEY WHERE OF THIS ADDITIONAL COST OF TICKET ON, RESPONSIBILITY THEY'VE TAKEN

ON? >> DOES HAVE A BEEN FILED YET. SO WE HAVE TO WORK THROUGH ON HOW THAT HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION, IF IT'S JUST FOR THE SPACE FOR THIS PLOT OR IF IT'S THE ENTIRE. USUALLY THE DEVELOPER HAS CONTROL OF THE ENTIRE

ASSOCIATION. UNTIL IT'S COMPLETE. >> UNTIL HE SELL A COUPLE OF

LOTS. >> IS THERE TRAFFIC THROUGH THERE?

SO FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES OR IS IT A STREET BASICALLY? >> IT WILL BE A DRIVE LIKE A PRIVATE DRIVE. IF THEY WERE TO BLOCK IT FOR ACCESS IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A KNOX BOX OR SOME SORT OF, SOMETHING APPROVED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE.

TO BLOCK IT. THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE DOES HAVE MECHANISMS WHERE THEY CAN INSTALL AND BLOCK IT IF IT BECOMES A PROBLEM AND THEY WANT TO DO THAT.

THEY HAVE TO GET THAT APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. >> OKAY, SO THIS IS SOMETHING WE JUST APPROVE AND EVENTUALLY IT GOES DERELICT AND IS IGNORED AND BLOCKED AND USED ENTRANCE INTO A PARKING LOT OR WHATEVER. N THE FUTURE. IT REMAINS FUNCTIONALLY USEFUL

IN OTHER WORDS. >> IT WILL ALWAYS BE THERE AS LONG AS THAT SUBDIVISION IS

THERE. >> RIGHT. >> I GUESS MY ONLY OTHER QUESTION AND YOUR CALLING IT A 20 FOOT BUT, IT'S SHOWING A 15 FOOT FIRE UTILITY BUILDING LINE

EASEMENT. >> IS 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE. >> WHICH IS 30 FOOT.

>> THE PAVEMENT BUT ONLY BE 20. > TO ACCOMMODATE A FIRE TRUCK.

SO YOU BASICALLY HAVE 10 EXTRA FEET IF YOU NEEDED IT. >> IT WAS ARNIE SAID THAT THE FIRE MARSHAL IN THEM THEY APPROVED IT AND EVEN THAT AREA I BELIEVE IS GOOD OR MAYBE IT'S JUST THE SECURITY IN ME WE HAVE AN EXIT FOR EMERGENCY PURPOSES AND NOT ONE WAY OUT.

I ACTUALLY BELIEVE IT'S A GOOD THING AND IT MAKES IT EASY FOR FUTURE REFERENCES WHEN THEY DO THAT THEY CAN GO THROUGH BECAUSE THEY ARE TO HAVE AS THERE IF THEY WANT TO TURN IT

INTO A WRIGLEY STREET OR WHATEVER. >> SEEMS LIKE A PRACTICAL

SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM. >> REALLY FOR ANY KIND OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES NOT JUST FIRE. AMBULANCES, POLICE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR

[00:15:01]

>> SECOND BY STRAKA SIN. ALL IN FAVOR SAY I APPEARED. >> I APPEARED.

>> AND HE OPPOSED. THE VARIANCE HAS BEEN ADOPTED. WE DO NEED TO APPROVE THE

PRELIMINARY PLAN. >> YES. >> MAY HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE

THE PLAYER PRELIMINARY PLANT. >> SECOND. >> ALL IN FAVOR SAY I PLEASE, I, ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES. BELIEVE OUR NEXT ITEM BARRED ME?

YOU CAN TAKE YOUR PICK. >> ANY OF US DOWN HERE. OUR NEXT ITEM IS A VARIANCE

[3. Preliminary Plat for The Covey at Quail Creek - City Plat File No. 210...]

MAYBE HAVE STAFF REPORT PLEASE. >> YES. THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE COVEY OF QUAIL CREEK. IT WILL ALSO CONTAIN THE FINAL PLAT REPORT FOR THE CUBBY AT AT COVE CREEK PHASE 1. THIS PROJECT JUST NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF BUSINESS 59 Ã PARTWAY IN THE CITIES EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND BEING THE SAME TRACK OF LAND DESCRIBED AS 6.5 ACRES CONVEYED FROM THE FRANK JUNIOR HERNANDEZ TO THE RODRIGUEZ INVESTMENT GROUP LP BY DATED MARCH 6/2018 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF INSTRUMENT 201 2252. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE CUBBY OF CO-CREEK IS A PROPOSED PLAT OF 6.59 ACRES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BOUNDED BY TURKEY LANE, DEB DRIVE AND WAREHOUSE ROAD. LOCATED NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF BUSINESS 59 AND ZACH LYNCH PARKWAY IN THE CITIES EXITS AERIAL JURISDICTION.

THE PROPERTY IS CRUMMY UNDEVELOPED AND BEING PLOTTED INTO 21 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN BLOCK ONE. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COVEY OF QUAIL CREEK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN 2 PHASES. ACCESS TO THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDED VIA LOCAL STREETS, TURKEY LANE, WAREHOUSE ROAD AND DOVE DRIVE.

THE FINAL PLOT FOR THE COVEY A QUOTE CREEK PHASE 1 IS A PROPOSED FINAL PLOT OF 3.15 ACRES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BOUNDED BY TURKEY LANE, DOVE DRIVE AND WAREHOUSE ROAD. LOCATED NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF BUSINESS 59 AND ZACH LANZ PARKWAY. THE PROPERTY IS UNDEVELOPED AND IS BEING DEVELOPED INTO 11 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS. ACCESS TO THE SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDED VIA LOCAL STREETS, TURKEY LANE, WAREHOUSE ROAD AND OF DRIVE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLOT FOR THE COVEY OF QUAIL CREEK IN THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE COVEY AT QUAIL CREEK PHASE 1. FINDING THEY MEET ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS.

>> ANY QUESTIONS ON THE STOP FOR THE STUFF ON THIS AGENDA? IF NOT WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AGENDA ITEM AT THIS TIME. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK? SEEING KNOW WHAT WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TO QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION. LOOKS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE PRELIMINARY PLAN. >> A MOTION.

>> ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE SAY I. >> I. >> ANY PROS?EARING ON THE

[D. Consent Agenda:]

THE CONSENT AGENDA? >> ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING IT?

[1. Monthly Development Report]

SAY HI. >> I APPEARED. >> ANY OPPOSED? NONE. CONSENT AGENDA HAS BEEN ADOPTED.

OTHER BUSINESS WOULD BE THE MONTHLY DEVELOP MET REPORT CELESTE.

>> WE'VE HAD A BUSY MONTH IN APRIL. GRANT FOR MINOR PLOTS, FOR MAJOR PLOTS, 10 SITE PLAN SUBMITTED. I WERE TO CANCEL ITEMS WERE APPROVED BY COUNSEL IN THAT FIRST MEETING IN MAY. OUR PERMIT NUMBERS ARE UP FROM LAST YEAR. WE ARE SEEING THAT BOOMING AGAIN.

ALBERT M AP PERMITS HER UP AS WELL FROM LAST YEAR AND WE HAVE AN INCREASE IN PERMIT FEES FROM LAST YEAR SO DEFINITELY THEY ARE BUILDING. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE

MONTHLY REPORT? >> AND LOOKS GOOD. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? HEARING

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.